Quality and readiness
Evidence mapping, document and competency-record review, completed PT follow-up, corrective-action tracking, and director summaries.
Review the quality programFor health systems and laboratory networks
One organizational agreement. A clear plan for each laboratory.
AssayIQ works with corporate and regional leaders to define shared priorities, then supports each participating laboratory through an approved site work plan. Leaders receive a consolidated view of risks, progress, resource needs, and decisions.
Designed for decisions made centrally
For chief operating officers, finance leaders, regional laboratory executives, quality leaders, and procurement teams responsible for several laboratories. A central agreement establishes the commercial framework; a site schedule identifies exactly which laboratories and services are covered.
Directors and managers gain a defined review queue and a consistent reporting structure, with room for their laboratory's instruments, workflows, policies, staffing, and accreditation requirements.
An illustrative network
A regional health system could approve one program covering four hospital laboratories. Each lab would have its own baseline, local contacts, action register, and approval process. Corporate leadership would receive a consolidated monthly report and a quarterly decision briefing.
This is an example of the service model, not a statement that any named organization is an AssayIQ client. Coverage applies only to sites and workstreams listed in the signed agreement.
Select the workstreams
Corporate consistency with local accountability.
Choose the services needed for the pilot. One agreement does not automatically include every service, unlimited reviews, or all future laboratories.
Financial impact and cost
Test-volume and payer analysis, cost per reportable result, purchasing and rework opportunities, and approved implementation scenarios.
Review the 2027 financial serviceValidation and assay launches
Scoped study plans, analysis, reporting, QC setup, vendor issue tracking, and local review gates.
Review validation supportCapacity and workflow
Activity-based workload assessment, coverage constraints, exception work, queues, and a measured improvement pilot.
Review workflow improvementFrom agreement to delivery
What directors and managers can expect.
- 01Define the corporate scope
Confirm the executive sponsor, procurement owner, participating sites, review standards, workstreams, available data, budget, and decision rights. - 02Establish the site baseline
Each participating lab receives an agreed evidence request, an introductory review, a gap register, and a named local contact. Site differences are documented before standardization. - 03Pilot the agreed work
Start with selected laboratories and a manageable review queue. Agree the acceptance criteria and reporting measures before assessing results. - 04Review and expand
Corporate and local leaders review the pilot, resolve open decisions, and authorize the next sites or workstreams through a written change in scope.
The monthly reporting package
- Site-level findings, evidence references, priorities, owners, and due dates.
- Corporate summary separating shared issues from site-specific problems.
- Review of agreed measures, including overdue actions, repeat failures, evidence retrieval time, rework, and quality safeguards.
- A decision log showing what needs corporate resources and what local leaders can resolve.
A quarterly executive briefing supports decisions on continuation, resourcing, and expansion. Reporting frequency, data availability, review volumes, and delivery deadlines are specified in the statement of work.
Commercial structure
Defined multi-site pilot from $25,000. This is the existing enterprise starting price, not an annual all-site subscription or unlimited coverage.
Ongoing corporate programs are custom quoted. The proposal separates central coordination, participating-site work, onboarding and backlog cleanup, specialist projects, travel, software licenses, and third-party fees. Any volume adjustment is agreed in writing.
Single-lab Quality Partner starts at $2,500/month. A network contract is priced for its actual scope; adding sites requires a revised coverage schedule and fee agreement.
Review starting pricesWho decides what?
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Corporate sponsor and procurement | Approve funding, participating sites, priorities, commercial terms, and changes in scope. |
| Laboratory director and site leadership | Confirm local requirements, approve technical and clinical decisions, assign qualified assessors, and authorize implementation. |
| AssayIQ | Organize the agreed analysis, review evidence, maintain the action register, prepare reports, and support implementation within the signed scope. |
The contracting package defines the master agreement, site schedules, service levels, confidentiality and data handling, responsibilities, payment terms, acceptance, exclusions, change control, and termination. Final terms are negotiated with the organization's procurement and legal teams.
Shared templates do not replace local approval or site-specific regulatory requirements. An organization-wide contract does not combine separate laboratory certificates or transfer director authority.
Scope a corporate pilot
Bring one regional priority and the participating laboratories.
Share the number of sites, priority, executive sponsor, and desired timing through the online form. Do not include patient information.